CAFCASS COMPLAINTS POLICY
CAFCASSs complaints process at the time of writing and having gone through the whole process, IS A TOTAL FARCE.
It is Satanically engineered, self-written, self-executed, self-decided, self-concluded behind closed doors, self-audited, criteria-less and factless decisions, totally unquestionable and fate compli ie. it can only be initiated AFTER the full hearing when they know that the damage has been already been done and irreversible. CAFCASS readily breaches its own timelines in complaint investigation, so as to use the will of time to try and create a new false 'status quo' [2] situation based on tainted evidence/lies and also to try and disillusion parents from pursuing their valid factual complaints against CAFCASSs wrongdoings. Another reason for CAFCASS to delay its complaints process, is in the expectation that the children become victims of PAS against the non resident parent - this helps retrospectively justify their previous corrupt decisions/actions against children. Then as we all know, CAFCASS are in TOTAL blatant denial of PAS recognised by the rest of planet Earth (click anywhere on this line to learn more on PAS).
Whoever engineered CAFCASS's complaints process, must have pure incestuous Satanic blood running in their veins as it is basically a irreversible loose-loose scenario for ALL CHILDREN. It is far worse than the Police investigating themselves for wrongdoings. Even in the rare instance a parent complaint was upheld (I am not aware of ANY in the thousands of complaints I can imagine its receives and has openly declared), the full hearing is over and the damage to the children has been done.
In addition to rebutting CAFCASSs factless template welfare reports (sometimes WRITTEN, BLATANTLY WILFULLY & UNLAWFULLY without the other parent, TWICE as happened in my own case), the aggrieved parent (usually the father [1]) will have to endure additional paperwork to rebut the false report, go through extremely stressful court hearings, aggressive cross examination, clever twisting and distorting of facts and INJECTED LIES by the other parents counsel {and by CAFCASSs OWN counsel as in my case}, on top of a barrage of false malicious allegations. THE CHILDREN HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO CHANCE OF A FAIR TRIAL, EVER, POINT BLANK.
CAFCASS state that there is no redress once their complaints process has been exhausted and then refer parents to their MPs. I did execute this process, BUT WITH HIND-INSIGHT, THIS IS ANOTHER SLIPPERY DIVERSION AND UNTRUTH. CAFCASS are a independent Public body, who retain full accountability for their actions, any other excuse is a slippery diversion.
Having compiled a very small subset of CAFCASS's failing/abuses, I did approach my MP and took the tortuous and time long route via the Parliamentary Ombudsman. In a nutshell the response from the Parliamentary Ombudsman was as I expected, another cover-up for a State body enacting covert unlawful policies [1]....
The Parliamentary Ombudsman has stated that the CAFCASS reports/actions are a matter for the Family Courts (Ombudsman can only deal with the mechanics of complaints process), I can personally testify (I can provide concrete hard factual evidence) - the UK secret Family Courts will NEVER address wrongdoing by its appointed agents, especially CAFCASS. This is especially true when CAFCASS help maintain the greater than 95% [1] custody, unlawfully to one gender.
Further, CAFCASS claim that their officers can be challenged in secret Family Court – this is another inaccurate untruth for and including the following reasons; Firstly, the full hearing will ALWAYS be severely time constrained and the CAFCASS officer will claim a busy schedule (often backed by the Court) and they have to be elsewhere thus further limiting their availability/accountability (as happened in my case) for their abuses. Secondly, anyone challenging a Court agent, bears the risk of the wrath of the Court. Thirdly, any wrongdoings are lessened and/or ignored by the ulterior motivated Family Courts [1]. CAFCASS know these facts fully well and use it to mitigate any challenge to their often factless biased [1] anti-children reports and actions.
So now between CAFCASS, the secret UK Family Courts, the Parliamentary Ombudsman, the circle of containment, institutional, national and internationally unlawful gender discrimination and the widespread abuse of children and parents is COMPLETE.
Once the Court decision is made (usually in the mothers favour [1]), coupled with the famous status quo argument [2], I can guarantee the Family Courts will never go back on its decision as to do so would be {wrongly} seen as to admit that it was wrong, its agents were wrong, they allowed children to be abused, thus {wrongly} perceived to be undermining it and its agents (ie. CAFCASS) credibility in the wider public domain.
Be absolutely certain, loss of face, credibility and appearance are more important to the UK SECRET family Court system, CAFCASS and its agents, even more so than the best interests of the children or for that matter, what is lawfully right. Their solution - divert, cover-up, lie AND NEVER ADMIT A WRONGDOING, just allow the children to be abused...
To put it very simply, CAFCASS's Satanically incestuous complaints process is an excellent example of corruption at its heightened peak. As a direct result of CAFCASS's unprofessional engineered actions, our children suffer.
[1] The 95% one parent custody (mothers) are from various sources including, Sir Geldof, The Times (UK) and private discussions with MPs, Court Officials and even a judge. These figures have yet been unchallenged or undisputed by the Court Service or for that matter the Department Of Constitutional Affairs (DCA) in the UK.
[2] Status Quo, the infamous argument frequently used in family Court proceedings by CAFCASS and others to retain custody/residence to one parent (usually the mother)
[Click here to sign the petition To The United Nations To Stop The Abuse To Children]